<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Naming Conventions: Java Packages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.efsavage.com/blog/posts/java_package_conventions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.efsavage.com/blog/posts/java_package_conventions/</link>
	<description>Good stuff, updated weekly(ish)</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 04:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric F. Savage &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Database Conventions</title>
		<link>http://www.efsavage.com/blog/posts/java_package_conventions/#comment-5983</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric F. Savage &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Database Conventions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 06:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.efsavage.com/blog/posts/java_package_conventions/#comment-5983</guid>
		<description>[...] Time for another naming convention. This time it&#8217;s something people care more about than Java packages, we&#8217;re talking about databases. Here are the rules, and the reasons behind them. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Time for another naming convention. This time it&#8217;s something people care more about than Java packages, we&#8217;re talking about databases. Here are the rules, and the reasons behind them. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kilby</title>
		<link>http://www.efsavage.com/blog/posts/java_package_conventions/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Kilby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 18:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.efsavage.com/blog/posts/java_package_conventions/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>A comment on number 8.  The version numbering of external packaging should be done only when the versions of the external library are not compatible with one another.  This would apply in your example of Hibernate 3, which differs significantly from Hibernate 2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A comment on number 8.  The version numbering of external packaging should be done only when the versions of the external library are not compatible with one another.  This would apply in your example of Hibernate 3, which differs significantly from Hibernate 2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
